![]() ![]() they're all the same.Īnd most important of all. also i don't like the fact that in cubase/nuendo and logic you're almost forced to setup your keyboard shortcuts. most of my work is done in one window in pt (plus only on plugin window). and the total freedom to build you mixer as you like in pt is really nice to. i think the way cubase/nuendo presents your takes clutters the wiev. i doesn't sound as good.Īs you said it's a matter of taste. and btw i don't like non-realtime bouncing. that means you have the ability to bounce all tracks at once (hd). In protools you have the ability to route the out of one track into the in of another. ![]() we tried it out but the editing was to poor. Trust your judgement over others as one persons work ethics will be different than yours. I've said it before.I'll say one thing.someone else says another. In the long run it's really down to what ever application suits you the best. I guess it's preference in the long run but I can't say that PT wins hands down though.just my opinion Really?!!! I find Cubase or Nuendo to be more mixing friendly than PT is.you can insert effects and Group channels in real time.Editing is a breeze in Cubase or Nuendo. Iznogood wrote: but pt wins every time when it comes to tracking vocals or editing and mixing. It takes a lot of time to bounce individual files out of pro tools. This is one of the very cool features that Pro Tools doesn't have yet. (they're also a waste of disk space imo)Īctually all you'll need to do is select all tracks and select Bounce Selected Files. but if you record a track and take it to a mac based protools studio i suggest gluing all audio together starting from bar 1 and using only 24bit files not 32bit float. ![]() cubase can read and write almost anything. ** Question 4 - anyne care to comment on their views as far as pros/cons of either software program? Or suggest other alternatives that might work well with this hardware setup?Ģ. Lightpipe in might be nice to have somewhere down the road, but isn't stricly necessary right now. ** Question 3 - can someone suggest a firewire interface that will work smoothly? All I ask is 8 analog ins, price is a consideration but I am willing to pay for something that won't let me down. ** Question 2 - will I have compatibility issues with this hardware setup using Cubase? If so. ** Question 1 - is that true? Can I assume the same will be true of the M-Powered version? The reason I'm considering Cubase rather than Pro Tools is because I heard that Pro Tools LE has a limited bandwidth compared to Cubase. The full Cubase SX 3.0 version is a bit more ($500). The new Pro Tools M-Powered is bound to be compatibility issue free with that hardware, and I've found it for $300. The choice I still have to make is which software I should go with. I should also mention I'm running a dual processor 2.8Gig AMD MP system with dual 160GB HDDs for recording and separate system drive with XP Home. Of course I'll need mics etc but I think I'm straight in that area. I'm putting together a recording studio to record drums for the most part (so I need 8 mic preamps at least), and I've pretty much decided that I'm going with the Mackie Onyx 1620 (about $700 US) as mixer, along with the M-Audio Firewire 1814 (about $430) as digital interface. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |